<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Riccardo Colasanti MD on Rielo Institute for Integral Development</title><link>http://riidblog.org/</link><description>Recent content in Riccardo Colasanti MD on Rielo Institute for Integral Development</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://riidblog.org/author/riccardo-colasanti-md/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Freedom That Kills</title><link>http://riidblog.org/post/05-07-2026/</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://riidblog.org/post/05-07-2026/</guid><author>Riccardo Colasanti MD</author><description>&lt;p&gt;According to Pavel Florensky&lt;sup id="fnref:1"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;, the “fundamental difficulty” of ancient metaphysics lies in how to reconcile unity with multiplicity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Applied to the field of politics, this means figuring out how to integrate the unity of a nation, an institution, or a people with the multiplicity and pluralism of the differences that are part of it—namely, citizens, intermediate institutions, ethnic groups, and minorities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A major transformation has taken place: for Plotinus, the One preceded being in ontological dignity. For postmodernists, all reality is an infinite difference where richness consists in not participating in a universal—that is, in nothing that is common to all.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Neo-Feudalism to Come</title><link>http://riidblog.org/post/18-05-2026/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://riidblog.org/post/18-05-2026/</guid><author>Riccardo Colasanti MD</author><description> It is highly likely that in the future—with artificial intelligence surpassing and replacing our own, and robots taking our jobs—our lives will be reduced, at least in Western countries, to that of mere consumers of mass media content. But this is the positive scenario, the best-case scenario. There is worse. Mass media content is, in fact, produced because there are those who, in one form or another, pay for its consumption—that is, purchase it. But if robots replace physical labor and AI replaces intellectual labor, then the production of wealth will remain in the hands of our artificial counterparts. The market will become a matter of buying and selling between computers and robots. Humans will be excluded from the production cycle and, consequently, from remuneration. The capitalist economy will change profoundly. We will no longer be able to acquire mass media content because we will have nothing with which to exchange for the purchase. The market—the omnipresent, omnipotent market—will remain only a memory of the past, because society will revert to a feudal system in the hands of those few who control robots and AI. It appears that Elon Musk has announced that Tesla will build 1,000,000 Optimus all-purpose robots by 2030. Now, while it is true that scientific discoveries of the past have always required human personnel, it seems that robots are now crossing the line: if they can replicate every aspect of humans, then they can replace the human workforce.</description></item><item><title>Are we still human?</title><link>http://riidblog.org/post/05-03-2026/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://riidblog.org/post/05-03-2026/</guid><author>Riccardo Colasanti MD</author><description>&lt;p&gt;It is always terrible to see how humanity, generation after generation, finds its greatest aspiration in war, murder, and destruction. In the annihilation of part of itself. One might say, &lt;em&gt;“It&amp;rsquo;s not my fault. It&amp;rsquo;s the other who is my enemy, and therefore I must crush him like a poisonous plant.”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the same argument used by Cain when questioned by Yahweh after spilling Abel&amp;rsquo;s blood, who gave the surprising answer, &lt;em&gt;“Who made me my brother&amp;rsquo;s keeper?”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The relentless cycle of pain</title><link>http://riidblog.org/post/06-02-2026/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://riidblog.org/post/06-02-2026/</guid><author>Riccardo Colasanti MD</author><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems that so-called political realism is in vogue, i.e., that there are no laws or rules to protect us, but that it is only important to know how to navigate the conflictual sea of reality, where nothing but force and power make sense.
That men, after such a long journey, return to the club, the stone, and the machete is indicative of a regression to the devastating powers of instinct, but also of an intolerance towards what had been the liberal canon in recent years, made up of a dense web of rights, which, however, had been transformed into the garment that Deianira sent to Hercules, a garment soaked in the poison of Naxos. Poison that killed Heracles.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Human geese</title><link>http://riidblog.org/post/05-02-2026/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://riidblog.org/post/05-02-2026/</guid><author>Riccardo Colasanti MD</author><description>&lt;p&gt;Those who go against justice are like wild beasts to other men. With sharp teeth and sweaty, shivering skin.
The harshness of strong men, their animal nature, which nothing can stop because they are dominated by their passions, is that of The Genealogy of Morals, when Nietzsche states that evil birds love lambs, &lt;em&gt;“because there is nothing more delicious than a tender lamb.”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This principle of forced saturation of one&amp;rsquo;s own being, this revelry to the point of bursting, eating everything, digesting everything, destroying everything, could be mistaken by some unhappy people for some kind of greatness, like towering above ordinary mortals. But the light is given to tyrants by mediocrities. The demigod, the superman, needs crowds of cheering mediocrities to praise and support him.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The autor has passed away</title><link>http://riidblog.org/post/14-01-2026/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://riidblog.org/post/14-01-2026/</guid><author>Riccardo Colasanti MD</author><description>&lt;p&gt;The year 2026 will likely mark the beginning of a new era, one of artificially produced literature that is indistinguishable from text written by humans. As the practice of writing with AI becomes more widespread, it will no longer be possible to distinguish between the human and the artificial. Everything will be open to question.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only works written before 2026 will be able to be attributed with certainty to a human author. But after 2026, we will no longer be able to be sure. A new era is dawning.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Artificial intelligence, a perfect false spiritual friend</title><link>http://riidblog.org/post/20-12-2025/</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://riidblog.org/post/20-12-2025/</guid><author>Riccardo Colasanti MD</author><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://riidblog.org/img/113.png"&gt;&lt;img src="http://riidblog.org/img/113.png" alt="Teaching"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Referring to the relationship between doctors and cancer patients, the president of the Rome Medical Association recently stated that it is &lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;a relationship [&amp;hellip;] that becomes fundamental, and patients, especially those who have suffered from cancer, know this perfectly well. I also say this to send an important message: artificial intelligence will never be able to replace or surpass this empathetic relationship between doctor and patient. Being able to talk, caress, comfort, and have contact is very positive.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;rdquo;[1]&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Innocence to be regained</title><link>http://riidblog.org/post/15-04-2025/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://riidblog.org/post/15-04-2025/</guid><author>Riccardo Colasanti MD</author><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://riidblog.org/img/joy.png"&gt;&lt;img src="http://riidblog.org/img/joy.png" alt="Joy"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After the Second World War we witnessed the aggregation of local markets into universal markets. This trend was driven by at least two postulates: that the market for all would be the secret formula for success and that a liberal guiding nation had been given the mission from heaven to lay down the rules and set the game.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aggregation was seen as a good thing, as progress exported to peoples who, while maintaining a certain identity of their own, finally accepted the idea that their world was not the ‘right’ one, but that what was right was aggregation behind a demigod-nation that would lead everyone to the highest peaks. So, union of markets and hegemony of a nation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Discouraged, we approach the abyss</title><link>http://riidblog.org/post/05-02-2025/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://riidblog.org/post/05-02-2025/</guid><author>Riccardo Colasanti MD</author><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://riidblog.org/img/abismo.png"&gt;&lt;img src="http://riidblog.org/img/abismo.png" alt="Abyss"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As is well known, the distinction in politics between “right” and “left” has long since lost its raison d&amp;rsquo;être. Today, the division between progressives and conservatives is more valid. Progressive or conservative ideas that take root in the two camps of the old “right” and “left”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We must consign these obsolete concepts to the annals of history. But once we have rid ourselves of the words “right” and “left” we must understand the differences, analyze this antagonistic global tension between conservatives and progressives, because this exhausting struggle is tearing the world apart.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Law as Social Software</title><link>http://riidblog.org/archives/24-08-2024/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://riidblog.org/archives/24-08-2024/</guid><author>Riccardo Colasanti MD</author><description>&lt;p&gt;The ordinary person, the one who is not an expert and has not studied the &amp;ldquo;sacred texts&amp;rdquo; of law believes that the essence of the law is justice. Concept that seems self-evident.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, people know that there can be problems. Corrupt judges or politicians can use the law to commit injustice, and use their power for sleazy self-interest. But this only indicates a disease, a pathology of the system.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>